Obesity And Diabetes Difficult To Treat In Children [revealed]
Obesity
and the form of diabetes linked to it are taking an even worse toll on America’s
youth than medical experts had realized. As obesity rates in children have
climbed, so has the incidence of type 2 diabetes, and a new study adds another
worry: the disease progresses more rapidly in children than in adults, and is
harder to treat.
“It’s
frightening how severe this metabolic disease is in children,” said Dr. David M.
Nathan, an author of the study and director of the diabetes center at the
Massachusetts General Hospital. “It’s really got a hold on them and it’s hard to
turn around.”
The
research is the first large study of type 2 diabetes in children, “because this
didn’t used to exist,” said Dr. Robin Goland, a member of the research team and
co-director of the Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center at Columbia University Medical
Center in New York. She added, “These are people who are struggling with
something that shouldn’t happen in kids who are this
young.”
Why the
disease is so hard to control in children and teenagers is not known. The
researchers said that rapid growth and the intense hormonal changes at puberty
may play a part.
The study
followed 699 children ages 10 to 17 at medical centers around the country for
about four years. It found that the usual oral medicine for type 2 diabetes
stopped working in about half of the patients within a few years, and they had
to add daily shots of insulin to control their blood sugar. Researchers said
they were shocked by how poorly the oral drugs performed, because they work much
better in adults. The results and an editorial are being published online on
Sunday by The New England Journal of Medicine.
The
findings could signal trouble ahead, because poorly controlled diabetes
significantly increases the risk of heart disease, eye problems, nerve damage,
amputations and kidney failure. The longer a person has the disease, the greater
the risk. So in theory, people who develop diabetes as children may suffer its
complications much earlier in life than did previous generations who became
diabetic as adults.
“I fear
that these children are going to become sick earlier in their lives than we’ve
ever seen before,” Dr. Nathan said.
But
aggressive treatment can lower the risks.
“You
really have to be on top of these kids and individualize therapy for each
person,” said Dr. Barbara Linder, a senior adviser for childhood diabetes
research at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases, which sponsored the new study.
Sara
Chernov, 21, a college senior from Great Neck, N.Y., learned that she had type 2
diabetes when she was 16. Her grandfather had had both legs amputated as a
result of the disease, and one of the first questions she asked was when she
would lose her legs and her eyesight. A doctor scolded her for being fat and
told her she had to lose weight and could never eat sugar again. She left the
office in tears and did not go back; soon after, she joined the study at
Columbia. Like many of the children in the program, she did not even know how to
swallow a pill.
She
believes that the disease “is not a death sentence,” she said, if she is careful
about controlling her blood sugar. But it has been a struggle. Her family tends
to be overweight, she sometimes craves sweets and she has orthopedic problems
that have required surgery and have made it hard for her to exercise. She is
also being treated for high blood pressure.
A few
weeks ago, because her blood sugar shot up despite the diabetes pills she was
taking, she began using insulin.
Most of
the participants in the study came from low-income families: 42 percent had
yearly incomes under $25,000, and 34 percent below $50,000. About 40 percent
were Hispanic, 33 percent black, 20 percent white, 6 percent American Indian and
less than 2 percent Asian. Poor people and minority groups have some of the
highest rates of obesity and diabetes in both adults and
children.
Dr. Phil
Zeitler, an author of the study and a professor of pediatrics at the University
of Colorado, Denver, said many participants lived with a single parent or
guardian and, like Ms. Chernov, came from families with a history of diabetes
and had relatives with kidney failure or amputations.
“They’re
wrapped up in a lot of family chaos,” Dr. Zeitler said, calling them a
“challenging population” with a lot of stress in their lives, on top of the
normal chaos of the teen years.
Type 2
diabetes used to be so rare in children that it was called adult-onset diabetes.
Type 1, a much less common form, was most likely to strike children and
teenagers, and was called juvenile diabetes. Both forms of the disease cause
high blood sugar, but their underlying causes are
different.
Type 1
occurs because the patient’s own immune system mistakenly destroys the cells in
the pancreas that make insulin, a hormone needed to control blood sugar levels.
Patients have to take insulin.
Type 2 is
thought to be brought on by obesity and inactivity in people who have a genetic
predisposition to develop the disease when they gain weight. And they may also
have an inborn tendency to put on weight. The pancreas still makes insulin,
though not enough, and the body does not use insulin properly — a condition
called insulin resistance. High blood pressure and cholesterol often come with
the disease. Initial treatments include diet, exercise and oral medicines, but
many people eventually need insulin.
Doctors
began noticing an alarming increase in type 2 cases in children in the 1990s,
especially among blacks and Hispanics from poorer families. The problem had
started even earlier in American Indians, who have had sharp increases in
obesity in recent years.
The
current study was meant to find the best treatment. The participants were all
overweight, some very obese. All, with a parent or guardian, got diabetes
education. Then they were assigned at random to one of three groups. One group
took only metformin, a standard diabetes pill (also called Glucophage). Another
took metformin and a second drug, rosiglitazone (also called Avandia). A third
group took metformin and went through an intensive diet, exercise and
weight-loss program (which has worked in adults). They were followed for an
average of about four years.
The
results were disappointing: all three regimens had high failure rates, meaning
that they could not control blood sugar. Metformin alone failed in 52 percent of
patients, metformin plus rosiglitazone failed in 39 percent and metformin plus
the diet program failed in 47 percent. Metformin alone was least effective in
blacks, and metformin combined with rosiglitazone worked better in boys than in
girls. The failure rates were high even in the patients who adhered most
strictly to their treatment programs.
The
obvious conclusion is that better treatments are needed. Adding rosiglitazone is
not a good option, researchers say, even though the combination worked better
than metformin alone; rosiglitazone has been linked to an increased risk of
heart attack and stroke in adults, and its use has been restricted by the Food
and Drug Administration. There are other oral diabetes drugs, but none have been
approved or tested in children. In the meantime, the doctors said, the best
solution is to move quickly to insulin shots if metformin does not
work.
Ideally,
type 2 diabetes should be preventable, with improvements in diet and exercise.
But so far, that has been easier said than done.
culled from Window
No comments:
Post a Comment